January 24, 2011 by Olly N

Q&A: Auctions – on site or at rooms?

Dear Mr Newland Do you think Auctioning a property in ‘rooms’ against ‘on site’ has any influence on the bidding outcome?
- R

A lot depends on the setting and the weather.
If the setting is very nice then on site is preferable, but if the setting is nondescript — or the weather doubtful (such as the middle of winter) then rooms are better.
Cheers
Olly

Filed under: Q&A — Tags: , ,

January 14, 2011 by Olly N

Q&A: Funding

Hey Olly, As you know the major banks have really tightened the screws on lending now. I am trying to work out a way to buy another house without the need for a large deposit that the banks would require.I have a good lending history with my local bank and was wondering…..

When you eventually find a good deal, and say the property has a valuation of $210,000 And you strike a deal with the vendor for $170,000 can you use the equity you would have straight away as a deposit, that the bank would require for the loan?. Even if you only had $10,000 cash as deposit could the bank use the equity as a top up for the deposit?
Any help on this would be much appreciated. I have enjoyed reading your books and Keep up the good work and support you give to us investors!.

Cheers Lyndon

Dear Lyndon
Yes the bank may use the current equity to top up your deposit for some other, but that would depend how much equity you do have.
If you have say 50/50 equity the bank may lend you another 20%-25% plus your deposit plus a mortgage on the new purchase
Cheers
Olly

Filed under: Q&A

December 15, 2010 by Olly N

Q&A: Auckland Apartments

What are your thoughts on buying apartments in Auckland City right now? There is clearly some very keen pricing going on, even on freehold property. Many thanks, Liz

Dear Liz
Apartments were over priced a few years ago and now under priced but you have to buy the right ones. North facing, not leaky at least one bedroom
with a car park and over 50M2. Capital gain may be way off but the rents can be very good.
Cheers
Olly

Filed under: Q&A — Tags:

October 2, 2010 by Site Admin

Q&A: Full-time investing?

I am one your fans and have read your few books and almost all your columns. I am determined to become a property investor early next year as we are currently running a small shop in rural area. It will be me alone with 50-80k cash to start with and without any other assets for security purposes because my partner is very conservative of investing.
My question is this: Should I go to property investing full time straightway or should I acquire another business so that there is strong cash flow to support my property investing?

Regards, Rhett

Dear Rhett
With the money you will have available you will find it hard to pay the everyday bills and invest at the same time. I suggest you find a job either part- or full-time that allows you maximum freedom to get about and learn all about the subject e.g. real estate salesperson, taxi driver etc.
Better still. as soon as possible get a good mentor like me to assist you to speed the process up.

Regards
Olly

Filed under: Q&A

September 6, 2010 by Olly N

Q&A: Do-ups

Hi Olly
I’ve read all your books you’re very talented. I live in West Harbour. I have a lot of energy to get started into do ups in this area and Massey. Are they the right areas to start in as they are close to me and I know them well? Or am I better to look around the North Shore (better locations)? You can get some real bagains in Massey and the older part of West Harbour 1970′s and 80′s homes at the moment.
Thanks, Anton

Anton,
Do ups are the quickest way to make profits – cautiously though as this market is fragile and capital growth has slowed.
Do ups can be done almost anywhere – it’s just a numbers game in the end. To start with I would stick to areas you know and understand rather than venture into new territory.
However do ups can be a minefield and should not be attempted without guidance.

If you wish I will send you information about my mentoring programme could save you from making some huge blunders.

Cheers, Olly

Filed under: Q&A

July 31, 2010 by Olly N

Q&A: Keep or sell when moving away?

Hi Olly,
My wife and I brought a two bedroom brick flat as our first place in Christchurch in 2007 with thoughts of paying it off to a level where we could turn it into a rental. However we now would like to return to Wellington and i would like to sell it, but we are worried we will have to stay twiddling our thumbs until the market starts to rise again to get our money back. Also having heard scary stories about tenants gives me concerns if we do keep it.
Help! Thanks for any advice you can give.
Regards Dean

Dear Dean
First things first. You don’t say what you paid for it so it is hard for me to give any advice I would get a real estate agent to appraise the property as to its current sale value and rental level and see if you are likely to lose on re sale, or get your money back. If the suggested price is too low you either give up the idea of going to Wellington or rent it out at best rates.

The scary stories your hear are only a tiny part of the truth. Most tenants are decent and if you rent it out through an agent they will do all the checks for you on the tenant before they step through the door.
Regards
Olly

Filed under: Q&A

July 26, 2010 by Olly N

Q&A: Removing a caveat

Olly,
I’m wanting to know if you know a (trustworthy) lawyer that would be able to help me remove a caveat from my mum and dad’s property. Obviously there is a long story behind this but the basics are: The caveat was lodged @20years ago by my dad who used the house as collateral for 50k. My mum and dad divorced @two months after this loan was taken out and my dad left and now lives in oz. He made no payments after this time.

My mum (bless her soul) paid off the original ANZ mortgage (@15 years later) and when we went to remove their interest discovered that this caveat still existed — much to our surprise as we had forgotten about that loan.
I have tried to contact the place but found that they had resettled into new trust structures twice (as they were the Pacific Island Business Trust) currently operating as Pacific Business Trust. We have had no contact from this place for the last twenty years, no statements or letters or anything.

The lawyers representing them have been unable to find contract details or forms regarding this caveat. They simply left the loan to grow and [it] now sits at @100k.

My question I guess is, as they never pursued the loan and there seems to be no evidence ie, original contract in existence….is there a legal way i could just have it removed? The property (our homestead) has been stalemate for the last 20 or so years and rotting badly…. We (me and my mum) are wanting to remove my dad’s name, put my name in his place and raise a mortgage to renovate the house but…….this caveat is like a knife we can’t remove, so to speak haha….

Any advice, comments or help would be heartfeltingly appreciated…

Regards Hemi

Dear Hemi
I would have thought that any good lawyer could apply to the LTO and give your story and have the registrar remove the caveat after he has made all the necessary enquires.
Another way that used to be popular was to register a $5 mortgage on the property which meant the caveat would have to be lifted to do so. This method is frowned on but it has been used from time to time.
I invite other readers to submit suggestions to help Hemi and any one else in the same position as the situation is not uncommon.
Regards
Olly

Filed under: Q&A — Tags: ,

July 25, 2010 by Olly N

Q&A: Do-up and flick or keep as rental?

Hi Olly
I’m a builder living in Dunedin and I am looking to get into the property market and my question is is it better to do up houses and sell them on or keep them and rent them out?

Phil

Dear Phil

As a builder you have a huge advantage to start with and yes, doing up houses for fun and profit is one of the best ways to go in the current market.
However you (and any one else) who wants to follow this road to wealth must approach the subject carefully and in a business like manner.
The biggest error made by “ doer uppers” is to spend too much money and time on any one project and end up going backwards.
I have found that one month to get in and to get out should be the target to aim for with the average house.
Regards

Olly

Filed under: Q&A — Tags:

Hi Olly,
Thanks for giving me the opportunity to ask a question. I am interested in gaining a new perspective on my current situation. I own an Auckland city apartment which is cash flow positive. Earlier this year I purchased a four bedroom house in Otahuhu for $359K. I live there with a couple of friends. What is your opinion of Otahuhu? I chose Otahuhu because of its relative affordability, older style homes and large sections. Am I being overly optimistic or simply foolish about the area? The reason I ask is because I am interested in acquiring a third property for rental investment and am not sure which type of property I should select. I am wondering whether it is wise to purchase a 3 bedroom house in Otahuhu for around $300k or whether I should go for a unit in a better suburb. Much appreciate your time.
Cheers, Andrew.

Dear Andrew
Otahuhu has some very nice areas and is one of the more popular South Auckland suburbs. I owned several buildings in the main street over the years as well as flats (Hall Ave, Great South Rd, Walmesley Rd, Atkinson Ave etc) and found it all very profitable most of the time (there were some horror stories but that’s one of the hazards of the game).

Whether you buy in Otahuhu again or elsewhere all depends on the bargain you get.
Let the deal will drive where you invest next- not you forcing the matter. A unit in a better suburb all depends what you call “better”. A good 3brm house is always preferable over a unit but spread out and look and learn. The aim is surely to make money so that is must be your goal. Which suburb and what it is come second.

Some of my clients like buying up in one area because they get to know it well, while others spread around to get balance and reduce risk. So long as you buy well and keep away from bad areas and bad properties you will come to little harm.
Regards

Olly

Filed under: Q&A

July 13, 2010 by Olly N

Q&A: Shift to smaller centre?

Hi Olly

It’s great you have given us the chance to ask questions thank you. My apologies in advance if this is a stupid question. We bought our house 4 years ago in Titahi Bay and currently have a mortgage of 247k with rv of 315k. The part we are in is a reasonable part – quiet and owner occupied but other parts of the suburb are not so great. We are thinking of a move to a smaller city (W*) in a year or so (not definite) and also planning on kids and dropping to one income.

We are concerned about the amount of mortgage repayments rates and insurance (plus maintenance) on one income. We are tossing around the idea of selling now and renting or buying something smaller or buying something in W* to rent out till we moved there. We don’t have to desperately sell right now but don’t want to be stuck in year or so having to sell. What are your thoughts? Are we best to wait and try and sell in a year or so or try and sell now?

Vanessa

Dear Vanessa
If you are going to sell you may as well get on with it as it will likely take a few months anyway. But you have to be sure that you want to move to W* so don’t start until you have made your mind up. I would rent in W* for a start as it will be cheaper than owning, and you can see how well you cope on one salary and a little one to feed.
Best of luck
Olly

Filed under: Q&A
« Newer PostsOlder Posts »